The “Who’s Who” of the Rubicon
Posted: February 17, 2014 Filed under: Access | Tags: El Dorado County, ENF, LTBMU, Placer, TNF Leave a commentWho’s Who? A look at the government agencies, clubs, organizations, forests, property owners, representatives, counties and water districts that affect or govern the world famous Rubicon Trail
Alright, this article grew to be longer than I thought as there are far more interested parties regarding the Rubicon than originally thought. That and I tend to go overboard. In no particular order:
Counties
The Rubicon Trail spans two counties, Placer County (PCo) in the east and Eldorado County (ElDoCo) in the west. The dividing line on the Rubicon Trail is the north border of the “Rubicon Springs” property. Both counties are involved with managing the Rubicon Trail. Below are links to the Rubicon Trail pages for each county.
Placer County Rubicon page:
http://www.placer.ca.gov/departments/works/mckinneyrubicon
El Dorado County Rubicon page:
http://www.edcgov.us/Government/Rubicon/Information_to_the_Rubicon_Trail.aspx?terms=rubicon%20trail
Rubicon Oversight Committee
El Dorado County has a long established committee that deals with nothing but Rubicon Trail issues called the Rubicon Oversight Committee (ROC). This has been a huge help to getting things accomplished by both the county and the users. The county run meetings are monthly meetings are attended by county officials, FOTR, RTF, users, anti-OHV people, sometimes state officials and other interested parties. The meetings are open to the public and held on the second Thursday of each month at the ElDoCo facilities in Placerville.
The county supervisors for each county are:
Jennifer Montgomery
Placer County
175 Fulweiler Avenue
Auburn, CA 95603
Norma Santiago
El Dorado County
330 Fair Lane
Placerville, CA 95667
Key county workers:
Placer County – Kansas McGahan, Senior Civil Engineer, works out of the Kings Beach office at Lake Tahoe.
El Dorado County – Vickie sanders, CAO Administrative Analyst at the County of El Dorado, I think is now in charge of ALL parks/trails within ElDoCo. A Donna Mullens is now the one sending out the minutes and agendas for the ROC meetings.
Forests
The Rubicon Trail crosses three ‘forests’: the Eldorado National Forest (ENF), the Tahoe National Forest (TNF) and the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU, technically not a forest). The Rubicon crosses the border between the ENF and the TNF at Miller Creek at the bottom of Cadillac Hill. The Trail crosses from the TNF to the LTBMU east of Miller Lake. (When you see an Arizona crossing with rocks imbedded in it, from there east is the TNF). The TNF is working to replace the sign that was once there.
Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU)
Home http://www.fs.usda.gov/ltbmu
Rubicon http://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/ltbmu/recreation/ohv/recarea/?recid=11829&actid=93
Nancy J. Gibson is the Forest Supervisor
(Still working on who should be THE contact for Rubicon issues)
Tahoe National Forest (TNF) – Truckee District
Home http://www.fs.usda.gov/tahoe
Rubicon http://www.fs.usda.gov/recarea/tahoe/recreation/ohv/recarea/?recid=56204&actid=93
Tom Quinn is the TNF Forest Supervisor
Joanne Robique is the Truckee District Ranger
Susanne Jensen is the seasonal OHV Recreation Specialist for the Truckee District
Eldorado national Forest (ENF) – Pacific Ranger District
Home http://www.fs.usda.gov/eldorado
Rubicon – The ENF does not have a Rubicon page
Lawrence Crabtree is the Forest Supervisor
Richard Thornburg is the Pacific District Ranger
Debbie Gaynor is the Recreation Specialist for the Pacific District
Water Districts
This is where things really got started back in 2000. A complaint was filed and the Lahontan Water Board stepped in to make sure the Rubicon Trail was not harming the water entering Lake Tahoe. Years later, a similar complaint was filed with the Central Valley Water Board for that watershed. Both efforts failed to close the trail but instead brought funding to maintain the Rubicon Trail.
The Lahontan Water Board manages the Lake Tahoe Basin watershed and thus covers the LTBMU. The Central Valley Water Board covers both the TNF and the ENF sections of the Rubicon Trail.
Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/lahontan/
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/rwqcb5/
State (wide) agencies
CA State Parks – Off Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation (OHMVR)
State Parks are involved in the Rubicon Trail by providing grant funding to the national forests, and non-profit groups and by providing law enforcement as needed for the Rubicon Trail and all other OHV trails in the state.
Grant contact – George MacDougall
LEO Contact – Brian Robertson
CA Association of 4 Wheel Drive Clubs (Cal4)
Cal4 has been around for a VERY long time, if you’re not a member, sign-up now. They are THE agency that allows scores of clubs to stand together to fight for OHV access on public lands.
Nevada 4 Wheel Drive Association (N4WDA)
These guys are new to the scene. There have been Nevada state organizations around before but they didn’t last. With the new OHV registration requirements in Nevada, there was a need to have a formal group to work with those collecting the money to make sure it goes to OHV needs and not in to the general fund. There are also access fights to be fought, like the grouse issue, in Nevada.
Government (elected) Representatives
Governor
Jerry Brown
Senators
Barbra Boxer
Dianne Feinstein
State Representative for the Rubicon area
Ted Gaines – State Senator
Brian Dahle – State Assembly
Frank Bigelow – State Assembly
US Representative
Tom McClintock
Volunteer Organizations
Friends of the Rubicon (FOTR)
Rubicon Trail Foundation (RTF)
www.RubiconTrailFoundation.com
Country wide agencies
Blue Ribbon Coalition (BRC)
Tread Lightly!
United Four Wheel Drive Association
Private Property owners
Rubicon Soda Spring Incorporated (RSSI)
(Sixteen or seventeen owners in this group)
The half section that is the “Rubicon Springs”
Rubicon Trail Partnership (RTP)
(I think there are only six people in this group)
East half of the Spider Lake area
Auburn Jeep Club – private parcel
Five acres between Ellis Creek and Walker Hill
Rubicon Trail Foundation (RTF) – not yet open to vehicle traffic, working on an easement
The half section between the Spider section and the Rubicon Springs section
There are many other privately owned parcels along the Rubicon but these are the groups I had information on and that are known to support OHV use.
Disclaimer: I know this is NOT a complete list of everyone out there that is helping or at least interested in the Rubicon Trail. If you feel your organization should be on this list, send me the details and I’ll add you.
14N39 – Meeting with the ENF 12-12-13
Posted: December 13, 2013 Filed under: Access, Maintenance | Tags: 14N39, ENF Leave a commentYesterday, I drove over to the Pacific Ranger District headquarters of the ENF. I met with Richard Thornburg, Debbie Gaynor and Charis Parker. We met for about an hour and discussed where we were with 14N39 and what was in front of us in the way of data collection, planning and implementation of the fixes.
The overall plan is that over the next three years, 1/3 of the trails will be reopened each year. The work will be done in two phases. The first phase will be anything and everything that can be done as ‘maintenance’; stuff that does not require extensive paperwork and expensive studies. Phase two will be everything that will require NEPA, EIS and/or EAs. The last issue on 14N39, will require a reroute and thus NEPA and more and is not even scheduled for scoping until 2015.
The ENF has hired a new hydrologist that will start in January. There will also be a FS expert brought in to help determine and approve any fixes to the ‘meadow issues’ throughout the ENF.
The ENF is scheduled to release an update regarding the ‘meadow’ issues across the whole forest in late January.
So, moving forward, the ENF claims that 14N39-1 and maybe -5 and -7 should be simple maintenance issues that once visited (again) will be fast tracked to completion. The ENF claims that not enough data was collected during the Aug 15 trail visit. They say that the new hydrologist and a road engineer need to visit each cite before they can sign off on the ‘fix’.
The ENF claims that this will be a quick process, like visit the trail on Wednesday and 9 or 10 days later, the volunteers will be on the trail working with the FS to fix the issues. The funding is already in place (for maintenance) and any equipment and material needed is easy enough to get in a week. With enough volunteers, I think the first three issues can be fixed in one weekend.
We will keep an eye on the trail this spring and once it is safe to travel, I will schedule a tour of 14N39 in order to get those fixes in place as soon as possible.
14N39
Posted: December 6, 2013 Filed under: Access, Maintenance | Tags: El Dorado County, ENF, Richardson Lake Leave a commentFor some time, there has been a fight going on over 42 trails within the Eldorado National Forest (ENF). Right now, 24 of those trails have been opened. The remaining 18 trails need some kind of fix, from simply putting down gravel to rerouting a ½ mile of trail.
One of these trails is the Richardson Lake Trail, 14N39. The Richardson Lake Trail turns south off the Rubicon Trail just west of Miller Lake. It runs past the Sierra Club’s Ludlow Hut on the way to the summit of Sourdough Peak.
The trail does not offer much challenge to OHV users but provides an awesome view from the top. At the top, looking west, you look down on Desolation Wilderness, Loon Lake and the Rubicon Trail. The summit offers some of the best sunsets I’ve ever seen.
Although the ENF has been slow to work with the users to form and implement a plan to repair the four ‘meadow’ issues on the trail, they have closed the trail. The following signs now grace the Richardson Lake Trail just south of Miller Creek.
I am currently trying to work with the ENF to get a plan developed this winter, so we can hit the trail early next spring to repair and re-open the trail. Getting access to Richardson Lake should be straight forward. Use of the trail for the next mile or so is also doable. But user access to the summit might require a reroute and lots of NEPA, EIS and other studies.
Stay tuned.
The 'Other' Rubicon 