Adopt – a – trail (water bar)
Posted: January 19, 2014 Filed under: Maintenance | Tags: FOTR, grant, LTBMU, Placer, TNF Leave a commentThe Rubicon Trail Foundation has recently released information about the ability to ‘adopt’ a section of the Rubicon Trail within El Dorado County:
Okay, you’re asking, “I thought this website was about the Tahoe side of the Rubicon Trail?” Well, it is. Let me twist the story a little bit.
RTF has again stepped up to better organize getting maintenance done on the Rubicon Trail. They have worked out a plan with El Dorado County to have different clubs/groups/organizations to adopt a section of the world famous Rubicon Trail. Basic, routine maintenance and clean-up will be done by club members. Any major projects that come up will be led by the club but put out to FOTR for additional support as needed.
So, the Tahoe side twist is this, what about an “Adopt-a-water bar” program?
There were 28 ‘rolling dips’ (we all refer to them as water bars) built on the Rubicon Trail within the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU) in 2001. Over the years they have received some annual maintenance but they could use a little more love. This summer, Placer County will use OHMVR funds to create more rolling dips and drains (like 35 of them) along the Rubicon Trail between Miller Lake and the turn at Barker Pass Road (Forest Road 03).
Why not ask OHV clubs to ‘adopt’ one water feature, be it a water bar, a rolling dip or a drain? All that would be asked of these clubs would be to do maintenance on their one water feature once a year.
Dozens of clubs, from all over the western United States, organize an annual club run to the Rubicon Trail. It would be a simple addition to that trek to stop at the clubs’ one “Adopt-a-water bar” and spend an hour or so clearing the drain, digging out any sediment and re-covering any bare spots with rock.
As FOTR steps up to help Placer with labor and thus ‘matching finds’ for the OHMVR grant, the clubs involved could volunteer to adopt whatever water feature they were working on. This would establish ‘ownership’ from the beginning and instil pride in creating and maintaining each feature.
There would be some details to work out, namely, a Tahoe side local might be needed to scout the water feature to determine if any materials would be needed for any maintenance effort each year and then get those materials dropped off prior to the maintenance effort but easily overcome.
The Story of the Snow Gate
Posted: January 12, 2014 Filed under: Access, Travel | Tags: LTBMU, Placer, Rubicon Leave a comment
Once upon a time, like 1999-2000, some very anti-OHV people tried to close the Rubicon Trail. They argued that Jeeps crossing seasonal creeks caused erosion and released sediment which found its way to Lake Tahoe. The only solution they saw was to close the trail.
In 2000, FOTR was formed. In 2001, 1800 cubic yards of crushed rock was placed at 28 newly built rolling dips at each seasonal creek crossing on the Rubicon Trail. This was not enough for the anti-OHV people. They argued that the rest of the trail was still wet and they wanted a gate to close the trail after the first rain of the fall that was to be opened only after the trail had completely dried out.
The private property owners said they would have to have a key to that gate and that after receiving that key they would make copies for their 10,000 closest friends. The county needed another solution.
A snow-gate was proposed. The snow removed from the neighborhood streets would be piled at the entrance to the Rubicon throughout the winter, thus creating a “snow” gate and preventing winter use of the Rubicon Trail. Come springtime, once the HUGE pile of snow had melted, the assumption was that the trail would be dry enough for wheeled use.
More than a dozen years later, equipment improvements have allowed wheelers to use the Rubicon year-round. The trail never officially closes. Wheeling over the snow is probably the most ecologically friendly type of wheeling as you’re leaving tracks on several feet of snow that once it melts, you’ll never know anyone was there.
Snow is still piled at the entrance but if you have a capable enough rig, you can legally drive over the ‘snow-gate’ and access the Rubicon Trail.
John Arenz, of RTF, has compiled a list of things to carry with you while winter wheeling:
- SIGNALLING PANEL, Ultra High Visibility, two color 24” x 69” heavy duty nylon (1)
- SLEEPING BAG, mummy style w/compression stuff sack (1 for each person)
- TENT, 6 person (1)
- SLEEPING PADS, insulated (1 for each person on board
- WATER PURIFICATION TABLETS, germicidal, (25 quart )
- HAM RADIO, dual band, w/ clamshell battery and spare AAA’s
- GPS, portable
- SNOW SHOES (1 pair for each person)
- COMPLETEOUTDOOR CLOTHING (for each person)
– Full gore-tex shell
– Full inner layer
– Spare socks
– Snow boots
– Insulated gloves (2 pair)
– Snow hat
– Ski goggles
– Day pack
– Water bottle
- BUTANE LIGHTER, visible reservoir without childproof lock
- STROBE, red, emergency signaling w/industrial ‘D’ cell battery
- ALUMINUM SNOW SHOVEL (2)
- CHAIN SAW, minimum 24” bar, w/ spare fuel and chain
- FOLDING SAW, portable
- SIGNALING MIRROR, Unbreakable
- FLASHLIGHT, LED (2)
- SHELTER TARP, polyethylene reinforced/grommeted 16’ by 20’
- SUNSCREEN, SPF 30 or better
- SIGNAL FLARE GUN, w/ 12 flares
- MEAL, READY TO EAT, Assorted Menu (6 Each)
- HI CALORIE DRINKS, powder (6 quarts)
- STOVE, portable camp
- POT, portable camp
- FLARES, 15 minute for fire starting and/or signaling (6)
- COMPASS, Lensatic
- REPAIR WIRE, four-spool stainless
- LOW TEMPERATURE BLACK TAPE, ¾” x 66’ Roll (2)
- SURVIVAL WHISTLE, Dual Chamber with Hypothermia Lip Guard
- LOW TEMPERATURE RED “100 MPH” TAPE, 2” x 20 Yards
- STORMPROOF MATCHES, With Sealed Striker (Box Of 25)
- SPACE BLANKETS, silver 54” x 84” (4 each)
- PARALINE CORD, 650#, 100 feet
- POLYETHYLENE BAG , orange, multiple use, 38” x 38” 2.5 Mil (6)
- AXE, one piece
- DUFFEL BAG, High Visibility
- HAND TOOLS
- SPARE PARTS BOX
- WELDER (underhood, Premier, with cables, hood, and tools)
Those anti-OHV people still monitor what happens on the Rubicon Trail. If you go during the winter, Tread Lightly! Cross country travel is only allowed by factory tracked vehicles. Don’t spin your tires as you transition from water crossings to snow. Winch more frequently than you think you should.
Let someone know where you are going and when you plan on returning. Carry all of the stuff listed above and more, like tools and spare parts. Never wheel alone or as a single vehicle.
And my personal favorite and this website’s motto: Turnaround, don’t go around.
LEOs on the Rubicon Trail
Posted: January 6, 2014 Filed under: Access | Tags: grant, law enforcement, LTBMU, Placer, Rubicon, TNF Leave a commentLast May, I organized a meeting of different law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction over the Rubicon Trail: Placer County Sheriff’s Office, Tahoe National Forest, CA State Parks and Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit.
What I wanted to avoid was the lack of communication and the inconsistency of enforcement that plagued the El Dorado side of the trail when law enforcement started patrolling there years ago. The goal of the meeting was to do a face to face meeting of the different agencies and officers who would be patrolling the trail. We weren’t trying to solve issues or plan out the 2013 season but just get everyone in the same room.
The Rubicon Trail runs within Placer County and the county recognizes the trail as a public right of way, therefore, the Placer County Sheriff’s Office has jurisdiction on the trail. The Sheriff has put in for and was awarded OHMVR grant money to buy a side-by-side capable of getting anywhere on the Rubicon. The Rubicon will not be the only place the sheriff will use the side-by-side. Any OHV trail within Placer County can be considered the jurisdiction of the Placer County Sheriff.
The Tahoe National Forest has also received OHMVR grant money. They share law enforcement officers with the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit. The TNF also has an awesome ‘OHV Recreation Specialist’ that is a pleasure to work with. She and the TNF understand that motorized recreation is a legitimate use of our public lands. She also has access to the TNF’s newly built up Jeep Rubicon to patrol OHV trails within the forest. The Jeep currently lives in the Auburn area but can be requested for use in the Truckee/Tahoe area when needed.
The CA State Parks LEOs have been on the Rubicon Trail for years, but only on the El Dorado side. For 2013, things changed. The park service decided that El Dorado sheriffs and the ENF could handle the west end of the trail (This was before the county removed the ability of the FS to cite for county laws.) and so they moved their operation to the Tahoe side. The plan is to store a side-by-side at the nearby Sugar Pine State park and trailer it to the trailhead to use. They also have an officer who drives the state’s Jeep Rubicon, that is quite capable, and he loves to get it out on the trail. They are working to store equipment at Rubicon Springs so they can patrol on the way in, spend a night or two and then patrol on the way out. Again, the state parks LEO can patrol any OHV trail, so they are not limited to the Rubicon.
The meeting went well and all who attended were glad for the opportunity to put faces to the names of those officers in their sister agencies.
For 2014, I look forward to working with the different LEO agencies to maintain the safety of the OHV trails and public lands on the Tahoe side of the world famous Rubicon Trail.
Placer County – Rubicon Grant
Posted: December 16, 2013 Filed under: Maintenance | Tags: LTBMU, Placer, Rubicon, TNF Leave a commentCA State parks has awarded Placer County a grant worth almost $300,000!
Link to a chart of awarded values, Placer County is number 67.
Starting October 15, 2013, Placer County has one year to spend the money and document matching funds through volunteer hours for labor and equipment. The grant funds: signage, rolling dips, filling holes, water bars, material and repairing the single lane of asphalt from the residential area to the staging area.
The wording of grant application can be found at the link below. The actual grant awarded changed mostly in the amount not the scope.
Link to Placer County grant application.
Thirty five different spots along the trail from the boundary with the Basin to the turn at Forest Road 03 have been identified as needing attention. Most are either creating a rolling dips or reestablishing the natural drainage from the trail.
The spots were identified, GPSed, photographed and sent to Placer County. A small group provided transportation while Placer toured the sites to take detailed notes and discuss options and fixes. Once Placer County documents the proposed fixes, they will get sent to the TNF to make sure the FS is good with each fix. This might require a trail visit.
Once all the fixes are decided and approved, the details of how to make each one happen will be documented. Contractors will need to submit bids for the ‘heavy lifting’, materials and transportation costs. This could take until July! At this point, the volunteer leadership will need to step in and work with Placer County to organize the volunteer labor portion of this plan.
The grant is HEAVY with matching funds from volunteers, so we will all need to document any and all maintenance efforts within Placer County.
This will probably be a September project with finishing touches leaking in to October. You might want to keep your calendar clear.
14N39 – Meeting with the ENF 12-12-13
Posted: December 13, 2013 Filed under: Access, Maintenance | Tags: 14N39, ENF Leave a commentYesterday, I drove over to the Pacific Ranger District headquarters of the ENF. I met with Richard Thornburg, Debbie Gaynor and Charis Parker. We met for about an hour and discussed where we were with 14N39 and what was in front of us in the way of data collection, planning and implementation of the fixes.
The overall plan is that over the next three years, 1/3 of the trails will be reopened each year. The work will be done in two phases. The first phase will be anything and everything that can be done as ‘maintenance’; stuff that does not require extensive paperwork and expensive studies. Phase two will be everything that will require NEPA, EIS and/or EAs. The last issue on 14N39, will require a reroute and thus NEPA and more and is not even scheduled for scoping until 2015.
The ENF has hired a new hydrologist that will start in January. There will also be a FS expert brought in to help determine and approve any fixes to the ‘meadow issues’ throughout the ENF.
The ENF is scheduled to release an update regarding the ‘meadow’ issues across the whole forest in late January.
So, moving forward, the ENF claims that 14N39-1 and maybe -5 and -7 should be simple maintenance issues that once visited (again) will be fast tracked to completion. The ENF claims that not enough data was collected during the Aug 15 trail visit. They say that the new hydrologist and a road engineer need to visit each cite before they can sign off on the ‘fix’.
The ENF claims that this will be a quick process, like visit the trail on Wednesday and 9 or 10 days later, the volunteers will be on the trail working with the FS to fix the issues. The funding is already in place (for maintenance) and any equipment and material needed is easy enough to get in a week. With enough volunteers, I think the first three issues can be fixed in one weekend.
We will keep an eye on the trail this spring and once it is safe to travel, I will schedule a tour of 14N39 in order to get those fixes in place as soon as possible.